Subjective probability seems to function the other way around. What do you mean?

While algorithmic probability declares objects improbable if complex, situations are subjectively improbable if they are too simple! 123456.png
Oh, as in the lottery examples?

Yes. Improbable if simple. Not in the case of magic. Prestidigitateur.png

You’re right. Now I remember.
Improbability is due to causal complexity in that case.		 Or rather to the difference between causal complexity and description complexity.

Yes. That’s how unexpectedness is defined. I was amazed by all the consequences of this definition.

You mean, concerning interest, relevance, aesthetics and all the other predictions? Yes. Relevance is my favorite one.

Why especially relevance? Because it defines intelligence, according to Turing’s imitation game.

Well, if I follow you correctly, relevance, and therefore complexity drop, define the way we think? Yes. It’s as if our mind was some kind of compression machine.
That’s something!

Indeed, it’s quite unexpected (oops) to see our minds put in equations that way! It seems you’ve become a supporter of compressionism now.

Ha ha, yes, I guess I’m officially converted. Me too!